AND NOW THE TRUTH

ok, I admit it. I flew to Shoemaker's phony 'conference' with speakers so self-deluded they'd made power point presentations about themselves to show over brunch. I found the two founders of ayahausca tourism in Iquitos (you know who I'm talking about) to be liars, drunks and charlatans, I saw one Canadian who'd dosed his entire family with toe to trick them there at the behest of the Vine ,they didn't know what they were doing in the Amazonian jungle burning the Kambo and drinking the brew and seeing vampire bats sitting on their arms...but they were told the 'exo pheromones' of the planet beckoned them there...one self-obsessed American woman wouldn't stop talking shit about her bad daddy and kept projecting her hatred of men onto me and the vine just wasn't helping her in any way...another shaman had raped a German girl while she was under, another wandered around naked, shrieking out the name of the ayahuasquero for help but .... IT'S ALL GOOD BRO....IT'S A FRIGGIN EXO PHEREMONE BUDDY DON'T YOU GET IT? It's what the sex gurus of the 70s called 'kriyas' - bad shit that's necessary to flush out your psychic toxins. What Peru taught me was that it doesn't matter if you're in a tepee, a warung or an aya lodge humans, being human, will fuck each other over and dress it up in the parlance of the era. This is because of PEEP.

SCENT IS INSECT MEMORY

Have you ever wondered, and I know you have, why ants kind of feel each other up with their antennae when they bump into each other before they move on? Well, every ant carries with it the chemical residue of its explorations, held in a sac called a 'crop'. This crop is the property of the collective, not the individual ant. This exchange of pheromones actually is a form of intricate communication. Ever wondered why women seem attracted to you one day, but not the next? It's almost certainly because of your scent. It betrays everything about you at a sub or rather infra verbal level. Biology is destiny. So there.

WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?

A man is walking his four year old child though a meadow. The sun streams down on them, the breeze shifts the petals of the lilies and sunflowers as a wasp winds its way through the flora, it’s wings shimmering. The man instructs the child to count the petals on a sunflower to show they are a Fibonacci number. A willow sends forth his subtle fragrance. Ants move along its roots, holding aphids. A small starling feeds it’s brood in a nest, a dung beetle moves a particle of dung along. A field of potatoes lies ahead of them. But what is really going on here, in a world where 90% of life forms are actually one celled organisms? Firstly, The man, like all men, is crawling with parasites – his toes harbour the fungus candida albicans, his hair follicles are replete with democlex filliculirum – spider mites...herpes simplex , like 90% of the adult population, lurks in his nerve endings, lying dormant but ready to sprout. His small intestine is alive with trillions of bacteria, which have convinced his body it needs to synthesize vitamin B12. If any of these escaped outside the viscera, he would be dead in hours. Let’s move along to the wasp – it’s carrying a caterpillar it has paralyzed with a parasite co-opted to induce a torpor that keeps the caterpillar alive whilst the larvae are implanted in it ,to provide food . The larvae eat the insect from the inside, and somehow know not to devour the vital organs in order to keep it alive as long as possible. Nature’s snack fridge. The willow has leaves which are producing terpenes to defend itself against caterpillars but it’s a losing battle because ants are inducing tumours in its leaves called galls, using biochemical genetic engineering techniques evolved over millennia... but one of the ants has itself been attacked by a brain - eating fungi that now controls its mind, compelling it to climb up a branch where a fruiting body sprouts out of its head. Meanwhile a katydid has launched an all –out attack on the beetle, spraying a mixture of hot acid and pheromone to confuse, awe and madden the creature. However of all the creatures in this slyvan scene the most successful is the beetle, due in part to its genetic adaptability ,of which more species exist than can be catalogued....however the most parasitised creature in this charming Mormon pamphlet illustration of God’s magnanimity is the bird, host to fleas, lice, mosquitoes, leeches, ticks, parasitic worms as well as protozoa that attack blood corpuscles,...it is a habitat for more freeloaders even than Man, playing out the dynamic equilibrium of nature –struggling to maintain balance between life and its parasitic legions, which strive to thrive without quite killing its host – even as it expends energy feeding its chicks, one of them is an interloper – a cuckoo bird has placed one of it’s own in the starling nest. Something similar has happened to the Man, but he is not yet aware - he harbours an etheric parasite lurking in enteric plexus, controlling his actions in order to perpetuate its life cycle. It is the ego terratomorph, the Beast-Mind minion that squats and tells the Man he needs it. It brings a slave paradigm to his life, which will eventually bring death.
The little boy is scratching his head –already the arthropods which will be his constant companion through life are hatching in his follicles, and he has been bitten by a mite which will give him lyme disease, and ,if the resident nematodes escape from his throat to the body proper - necrotising fasciitis which will eat his flesh and weaken his heart.
It is an ecosystem sustained by ceaseless, merciless, ongoing , remorseless warfare, parasitism and infestation from the bromeliads in the upper branches to the fungal threads invading the potato crop, installing blight.. To add to the imperfection, the petals, as it turns out, do not add up to a Fibonacci number, but are one off.
The boy shrieks in pain. Someone has left their star tetrahedron jewellery in the potato crop in an attempt to cure it of the blight by focusing love rays from the Sun, but it has now penetrated the child’s foot and already millions of microbes are swarming over the wound, to meet up with all the endoparasites that await it in the child’s gut and muscle tissue – schistomes, sporozoa, flagellae, worm cysts. Everywhere the brilliant work of Nature is mocked, its inventions copied and turned against the inventor. Ha-Adama – Adam of the Earth ,welcome to Nature in the raw, to Life on Earth, to the cycle of death life and survival.... have a nice day.
from 'McKenna's Machine Elves'

 YES!


"The principles of soteriological jurisprudence dictate that the enslaved must be made aware of their true condition in order to preserve free will, or at least the illusion of free will. Yet the codicil – the ‘fine print’ - does not specify the mode of instruction – it might just as truly come from the chance remark of a beggar or a woman dressed in a cheap print frock singing ethereal icaros in the Peruvian night to a chorus of Cambo frogs. Insights might be delivered as much by bag-ladies or during a kitsch sci-fi series as in the soft pre-dawn helical rising of Venus…an ibis standing on one leg in a meadow... a blind Tiresias or unsung Cassandra or a poverty-stricken iteration of William Blake languishing in a debtor’s prison. It probably won’t appear as the packaged product that flies off the shelves… ‘The Secret’, or the latest Dan Brown or Paulo Coelho. It might be as clear as the sign above an exit door I once saw on a bus to downtown L.A. - ‘Espere Luz’ , it glowed –‘Wait for the light’, and I did. The pleroma cannot use the debased apparatus and signifiers of the ‘orthonormal’ cyber-world. Instead it speaks in glimpses, glyphs, tableaus and silences – in the framed face of a red haired woman, her face upturned, flanked by sullen faces on a train that pulled alongside mine on the way to Heathrow to take a plane to nowhere and the metro map read like a Kabbalah revealing my location – lower quadrant, belly of the beast, East Cheam. You’re here, don’t you want to be home, once again, outside ignorance, outside the cube, it spoke. Yes. Aren’t you tired of all this nonsense? Yes. Can’t you see you’re playing a three shell game the house always wins? Yes. Do you know how much your mother loves you and grieves for you? Yes. And I felt a flutter near my ear but I could see nothing. Don’t you feel what you gave up? Yes. Won’t you renounce your covenant with the Beast-world whose Prince is Death?
Yes I said and I saw how many were eaten from the inside and how their poisons seemed their deliverance, and how their illusions led them to love their captors and relish their pain and a tiny bird spoke to me, startlingly, told me to kneel down and ask the Holy Mother for forgiveness, ask her to take me back yes I said yes I will yes. "

from: 'McKenna's Machine Elves'

  SHRODINGER'S  CATAPULT

"The ‘sub-lunar’ consciousness cycle is thus:
Cogiton -> Eidolon -> cogiton -> Eidolon
This vibration from unmanifest to definition and back again creates movement through the psi field. If the Eidolon does not form, pure consciousness modulates as a wave through the psi field as:
Non-being-> being -> non-being
which is the driver for:
emptiness -> bliss -> emptiness :
the solutions to the primordial wave equation which has only one boundary condition – that there is only the one consciousness, creating nodes:
Being ->consciousness -> Bliss
Pure consciousness, detached from the entrapments of the chimeric, cogitoxic-rendered simulacrum, will induce pure cognition – the ‘proprietorial’ software will be over-ridden, and we at last become aware of our true state – that we inhabit a glorious fractal cathedral flooded with bliss-filled intelligence."

from : "McKenna's Machine Elves"

HOW WOMEN CREATED THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH ........

I had a dream last night. A man was seated at a table with a book next to him. the book was called 'The Law of All'. He was making bookmarks from strips of paper. One showed a field in winter, full of cabbages and bare trees to one side. Another showed a tall conifer with a stalk next to it with a bulb that was the head of a snake. Yet another showed a weather vane with 64 blades. One depicted a ghostly figure outstretched that cast a shadow over a barren field. A watch appeared on another - its hand bent like a Dali print. He had a stack of these bookmarks so I asked him if he was making a bookmark for every page because it was such an important book. No, he said. he wanted people to look at the bookmarks, because the real story is there. He handed me a bookmark in the form of a theatre ticket - to a show called 'Kabbalah is Forever,'- admit One.

Stay with me, I'm getting there. Firstly - the Bible. What is it? Well, the first section is just the Jewish Torah. The second section is the forcing of revelation to fit a priestly provenance. (Shoving a seagull into a boot). The NIV and KJV versions we think of as 'The Bible' , are simply translations from Latin and Greek sources , mostly, paying little attention to the original Hebrew signifiers that are its foundation. This means that modern translations are four or five times removed from the original source but the semiotic challenges don't end there and multiply when you consider that the Hebrew text does not supply vowels and hence a given sentence can support multiple meanings simultaneously, even when mirror-reflected. For example, Berashith ('In the beginning' ) can also be read as Bera Shith ('He created the six'). Furthermore, each word has a numerical equivalent (Gematria), so that, in a sense , if two expressions are given two different transliterations they are considered 'equal' or significantly connected.... so if you think of the Hebrew as an equation in physics in which so many variables all add up to zero, then as long as all the variables add to zero, they can all be considered 'solutions' to the semiotic conundrum. In his work of arch villainy and sublime arrogance- 'The Book of Thoth' - Crowley states that everything in the Hebrew sephirotic attributions immediately generates its opposite, therefore as long as the composite Gematria adds to zero, then everything is permitted. In addition, each Hebrew letter can form a kind of acrostic, which enfolds yet another layer of meaning. This process is known as notariqon, and is used by rabbis to decipher the true meaning of God hidden in an otherwise straightforward text. The early scribes and priests were, therefore, among the first deconstructionist sophists , if you like, conjuring up whatever meanings seemed expedient. In our own era, it has become fashionable to scan the Bible for evidence of ancient alien genetic experimentation - not an entirely unsupportable idea. Finally, and most centrally for this article, is the concept that the Hebrew text is actually coded Kabbalah. According to the Zohar - the Ur text for Kabbalistic study - the Bible can be understood ONLY by applying Kabbalistic principles.

In any case, and whatever your 'faith', the notion that the Bible is the inerrant word of God is looking more and more like the uninformed absolutism of a prevailing dominator culture that has coopted an Ur text for its own purposes. As many minds there are, and as many magical systems that exist, that is how many ways the Hebrew source text can be interpreted. So what I propose to do is unpack the Hebrew text a little for you, in order to demonstrate the myth of a patriarchal male sky god cult that invented monotheism, and to give you some intellectual ammunition against the religious imperialists of the Abrahamanic religions - those who preach against the Gaian stewardship of the divine shakti.
Let's start at the beginning, a very good place to start(you'll just have to imagine the Hebrew characters ).:
BRASHhith BRA ALHIM Ath HShMIM VATH HARTZ - Berashith Ben Elohim Ath Hashamaim Vaath Haaretz:
'In the beginning the Elohim created the substance of the heavens and the substance of the earth.'
The word Elohim is a plural form of the feminine singular ALH - Eloh, by adding IM to the word. but inasmuch as IM is usually the termination of the masculine plural, it gives the word ELOHIM the sense of a female potency united to a masculine idea, and thereby capable of producing offspring.
Now to me this is a revelation as it sets up feminine gods as the generative principle. So much for ecclesiastical patriarchy. But there is more going on here. The very word RVCh, Ruach, Spirit, is feminine. The Sepher Yetzirah (Book of Formation/Splendour - a Kabbalahistic text) states :' AChTh RVCh ALHIM ChIIM' Achath (feminine, not Achad, masculine) Ruach Elohim Chiim:"One is She, the spirit of the Elohim of Life."
So the Ruach Quodosh, the Holy Spirit, is female, as well as its immanent manifestation, the Shekinah, or sheath of Spirit.
It's looking like we have a matriarchal Biblical source predating the Abrahamanic patriarchal one.
However the matter (from mater(mother)) is way more subtle and complex.
'Substance' refers to the material world - the world of Assiah. Kabbalah posits four worlds or emanations of the Divine, each flowing into and out of one another, each with a degree of receptivity and transmissiveness. The highest is Atziloth, the Archetypal World - the illimitable and indefinable, the Soul of the great Absolute. The Being seated here is AIN - the Ancient concealed One, the unmanifest Absolute, also called the 'negatively existent One.'
Male and female are conjoined as potentialities only. Yes, God is an androgyne in case you didn't know. The next world of emanation is Briah, the world of Creation of perfect balance, with all potencies 'equiponderated'.
This is the connecting link between Macroprospus, the archetypal being and Microprosopus, the material manifestation - between the supernal Adam and the inferior Adam or Quod Inferious. This corresponds to the IH of the Tetragrammaton, IHVH (Yod Heh Vau Heh), which shows the kernel of the generational process which proceeds from father - mother - daughter - son back to father again. Jehovah or Yahweh are simply names that have gematric equivalence and are a mere gesture towards the original utterance of the Name, which transcends the attributes given it by the Judaic histories.
The next world is Ruach form, Yetzirah, the world of formation, the Mind and reasoning power of Definition/limitation/deduction and conclusion. This is analogous to the letter V (Vau), in IHVH - the bride of Macroprosopus, the lesser countenance. Lastly there is Assiah - the material world, the realization and completion of all things - Nephesh, the fourth form or vessel of the Ruach.
It corresponds to the letter H of the Tetragrammaton. What is important about this is that the Tetragrammaton forms a fractal holomorph. What that means is that it reflects, not only the four worlds but every conformation and operation between its elements is scaleable - that is - the structure is encoded within itself. For example, the human form embodies the four elements of IHVH on the head (Yod), the upper body and arms (Heh), the torso (Vau) and the legs (the second Heh). Also, the human cell has this structure and it also obeys the operational conformations of the equi-ponderated Sephira in its nucleus/cytoplasmic membrane/mitochondrial/cell wall system.
The subject of fractal holomorphism is too huge to go into here, but it is the key to understanding interlocking organic systems and decoding the kabbalah or rather translating it into modern terminology.

Back to the Bible. English translations from the Latin via the Greek state that 'God' created the heavens and the Earth, but clearly this is not what the Hebrew is telling us.
if the Hebrew intended to convey the meaning of the Supreme Being creating the world, it would have the term Tetragrammaton, IHVH -Jehovah, or Yahweh (the pronunciation of IHVH is known to only a few, according to the Book of Concealed Mysteries.)
If the text wished to present a truly monotheistic stance, it would have used : AIN - the absolute unmanifest or concealed Ancient of Days (the negatively existent One). Yet it does not. It clearly states that a group of female potencies created the SUBSTANCE of the heavens and of the earth. The secret here is in the correct interpretation of Vaath Haaretz, which places this act of manifestation squarely in the Asiatic realm (the world of Assiah or formation of the Nephesch vessel), which may also feed into the notion of creation being a product of demi-urges or secondary creator gods, perhaps even the fabled Annunarki). The meaning is that creation in Yetzirah manifests in Assiah. The material world therefore, is the product of demiurgic intelligences whose job it is to 'set the stage' for the infusion of the living Nephesh. The text continues, in Genesis i 20: 'Let the waters bring forth the reptile of a living soul'. This seems to be saying that the demiurges used some form of reptile to begin the creation of the Earthly Adam, which is separate from the supernal Adam, an archetype belonging to QUOD SUPERIOUS.
In any case, we are clearly in he Asiatic realm, OVLM HO-ShIH, Olahm Ha-Asia, the world of action, called also the world of shells OVLM HQLIPVTh, Olahm Ha-Qlipoth, which is the world of matter, made up of the grosser elements of the other three, or the concatenation of the Malkuth Sephira of the three higher worlds. In it also the abode of the evil spirits called QLIPOTH, Qlipoth - material shells.
Now, BRAShITH, Berashith - "in the beginning", may also be read, (by notariqon), BRA ShITh, Bera Shith - "He created the six." The sense is: the six emanations of microprosopus - benignity, His right arm, severity, His left arm, beauty as His body, victory as His right leg, glory as left leg, and foundation as the genitalia. There is also the unfolding of the six spheres which form the flower of life. Upon this depend all things which are below - the Queen of the lesser Countenance.
The creation of a man occurs in what seems to me to be two steps - firstly, the basic 'blueprint' - generic man, 46 chromosomes conceived from the world conceived from the world of formation -Elohim said :"let us make man." (Genesis i:26). Where it is not written HADM, Ha-Adam - - "This man", but Adam, man, simply, as a kind of fractal holomorph or Platonic ideal, equiponderated in perfected Sephira in Briah, not Asiah.
When it comes to creating a specific man, made of the substance of Earth, the term used is IVH Elohim; "VIITZR IHVH ALHIM ATh HADAM, Va-Yeyetzer Tetragrammaton Elohim Ath Ha - Adam."
'And Tetragrammaton Elohim formed the substance of a man from the refined elements of earth. (Genesis ii 7)
This is the first mention of 'Jehovah' or 'God' or the Tetragrammaton in the Bible - some 300 lines into it. But the Tetragrammaton actually embodies the Atzilothian realm of the supreme first cause and quickening intelligence that is itself enclosing the generative principle (The Yod and the first Heh). Yet coupled with ALHIM-Elohim - it suggests female and male potencies yoked to a common purpose.
It continues : "VIHI HADM LNPSh ChIH, Va-Yehi Ha-Adam el-Nephesh Chiah"..."And the Adam was formed into a living Nephesh."
Not 'living being' as the NIV has it, but a vessel that has been inspirited - given the water of life, not just the material subsystem, but a mind and soul.
This was accomplished by both the ELOHIM and IHVH or Jehovah.
So the Hebrew makes it clear that the entities responsible for creating the substance of existence are not the same ones that breathed life into it. The analogy in Sanskrit would be the difference between prakriti and chitta.
Throughout the English translations of the Bible, can be found many shocking simplifications of sophisticated concepts. Take, for example, the phrase 'son of God'. Does this 'God' refer to the Tetragrammaton, the Elohim, AIN - the Ancient Holy One, or does it merely mean the sons of Macroprosopus - from Quod Inferious (possibly genetic modulations of the original Nephesh by meddling aliens).

In Genesis the term is Thonogim - sons of Adam, (son of Man), referring perhaps to previous botched attempts to create life in the image of the supernal Adam.
Indeed, Genesis vi6 states: "And Tetragrammaton repented He had formed Adam in the Earth"
The phrase "Adam Hareetz - Adam in the Earth implies there is an Adam on and above the earth. Recall that each "Heh" in the Tetragrammaton can represent a different world.
Genesis goes on to say : "I will destroy the Adam whom I have created from off the face of HADMH, Ha-Adamah, the Earth" . This the Zohar takes to mean the non-supernal Adam, the Adam created using the earthly elements (DNA), and not Adam Kaedmon, the archetypal Adam.
So who is it who wants to destroy Adam? Tetragrammaton or Elohim, IHVH ALHIM? the English version of the Bible makes no distinction.

There is a promise to restrict the life of Man to 120 years because the 'Sons of God' (Annunaki,Prometheans?) had been fooling around with the help. But even here there are two types of cock-ups - another involving Giants:"There were HNPILIM Ha-Nephelim, BARTZ, Be-Aretz, in the Earth."
But the NIV clearly states they were ON the Earth. What else has been radically altered in the NIV and the KJV in order to conform to some simplistic Sunday school cosmology?
There is even some confusion among the Israelites in Exodus xvii 7 as to just which 'God' Moses is talking about.
The English translation simply says that the Israelites asked Moses if God was amongst them, whereas in fact the Hebrew original states that they asked -' Who is in our midst - the Tetragrammaton or Ain(the ancient concealed One)?' They know it's not Baal anymore, or Ashtoreth, but they demand clarity on which God has sided with them. The ancient concealed one is I suppose what most people think of when the term 'God' is mentioned - a kind of an absentee landlord - remote, unapproachable, capricious in his favours. But Yahweh(the rural peasants idea of Tetragrammaton) is something different - he belongs to Assiah - the realm of manifestation and the real politic of this rather marginal people whose 'empire' never amounted to much but who never let go of the idea that worldly power would come to them eventually, as long as they followed the deal cut with the warrior god Yahweh and his demands for blood and the stench of burning bodies. This is important because as Lomas and Knight have shown in their excellent work on the Hiram Key , many of these Babylonian/Sumerian/Semitic tribal deities were believed to be effective only within certain regions - and this included, in the early phases of the Diaspora, Yahweh himself. The feeling in Exodus is that the wandering in the wilderness has caused confusion as to the sphere of influence held by Yahweh...the distinction is important even today. The conjunction of Mercury and Venus that occurred in 7 B.C.(the commonly accepted date of Christ's birth) produced an extremely bright heavenly body that might easily be confused with a star(this happens every forty years); and this made the astral Levite priests sanguine that their Messiah had come. But of course , their idea of the warrior saviour King was at odds with Christ's prime message of Love and forgiveness. So their astrological predictions were cosmically correct (cognate to the peshers inserted in the Biblical texts to make biography conform to prophesy), but not in the sense of fulfilling their limited tactical political aims. This I call the Macbeth syndrome , where a future is presaged that appeals to the vanity of the supplicant, but which also contains a parallel ambivalent implicit message foreshadowing the ultimate defeat of all egotistic and worldly ambitions that usurp divine (astrally ordained -"written in the stars") cosmic order. Lomas and Knight demonstrate , in their work 'The Book of Hiram', that the astral priests were custodians of the Shekinah - whose influence was tracked by the periodic helical pre-dawn rising of Venus - and regarded astronomical auspiciousness as an essential prerequisite to the successful wielding of supreme Kingly power, and furthermore that the early Israelite Kings were fanatical about securing it.
So much for the vaunted 'monotheism' of Judaism, which vanishes on closer textual analysis of the primary source material.

Moses, in Exodus is figuratively pulling out his hair at the stupidity of his flock, to the point where he calls the place they're camped 'the Quarrel'.
But we can understand the Israelite confusion - even the Book of Concealed Mysteries makes a distinction between 'The Tetragrammaton in the midst of us and the ancient of days'
The book of Concealed Mysteries (from the Zohar) avers that the distinction is both Microprosopus who is called AIN appears only from the point of view of the Yetzirah.
In the teaching of Rav Yeyeva the Elder, we are to call; Microprospus (the lower Archetypal Adam) AThH, Atah, Thou; but the most Holy Ancient One who is concealed, HVA - Hoe - He.
Do try and keep up.
And I know there's a missing Monty Python sketch there somewhere but there are still a couple of good reasons to study the Hebrew of the Torah closely, because it contains the atavistic fossils of pre-cyber linguistic misappropriation of the original light source code. Encoded there are hints of several attempts to create a balanced expression of the Ancient concealed one on Earth - botched and restarted. Our analysis, using Kabbalistic concepts, of the English Biblical texts has verified that they have been altered and the data corrupted,
Is it the 'M' tort of a 'Q' source, the Q source being Kabbalah presumably, or is it? Has the Kabbalah itself been infiltrated and corrupted? There is evidence, too, of this, but it remains the only quasi-scientific analysis of consciousness as it operates in the living cell.

from 'This Mortal Coil'

 WHY ARE WE BORN?

"In much the same way we cultivate Saccharomyces cerevisiae for its intoxicating secretions ; humans , in turn , are being cultivated.
And what is it that our keepers prod and induce us to secrete ? The short answer is : Duality consciousness .
Currently the human race is regarded by the dominator class as a seething bio- mass for the production , refinement and dissemination of further ,higher and ever subtler levels of exquisitely poised delectable (to them) forms of duality consciousness in direct opposition to cosmic order."

From ; 'This  Mortal Coil'